Skip to main content

Death of failed ‘Messiah’ Sun Myung Moon brings out cult defenders...

Submitted by nabashalam on Thu, 09/13/2012 - 14:35


Since the death of Sun Myung Moon, the cult leader whose convoluted theology included recruiting new members with “Divine Deception” — news reports have recounted the history of his controversial Unification Church.
The passing of the self-proclaimed ‘Messiah’ — who claimed that Jesus, Muhammad, Confucius, Buddha, Martin Luther supported his claim that he was fulfilling the mission Jesus allegedly failed — also brought out some folks who used the opportunity to talk nonsense about cults.
That includes Eileen Barker, known to cult experts as a cult apologist. A cult apologist is someone who defends cults by, among other things, minimizes their activities and influence.
At times cult defenders do provide some necessary balance to overly sensationalistic reports, but more often than not genuine problems associated with deceptive movements are simply pooh-poohed.
Such is the case with Barker’s opinion piece, Did the Moonies really brainwash millions? Time to dispel a myth. In essence the sentiment appears to be that since the Moonies (as they called themselves) were quite bad at recruiting, there really wasn’t much of a problem. Tell that to someone who lost his son or daughter to a cult.
Philip Jenkins, Distinguished Senior Fellow at the Institute for Studies of Religion at Baylor University, may not be a cult apologist per se, but his opinion as expressed in the Wall Street Journal item, How We Became Obsessed With Cults, is in line with their thinking.
One may wonder how much he has been influenced by his Baylor colleague J. Gordon Melton, a man so notorious for his defense of cults that he has been referred to as ‘the father of cult apologists.’
Here’s the other side of the coin:
Dear Colleagues: Integrity and Suspicion in NRM Research: Benjamin Beit-Hallahmi, professor of psychology at the University of Haifa, Israel, addresses the problem of collaboration, including a) financial arrangements between certain sociologists of religion and the ‘New Religious Movements‘ they studied, and/or b) the production of shoddy ‘research’ papers that might as well have been made-to-order Public Relations efforts for such movements.
Research resources on cult defenders
Alternative Religions and Their Academic Supporters

This editorial/opinion/news alert has been provided or distributed by FACTNet, Inc. (Fight Against Coercive Tactics Network Inc.) Please visit our web site at to comment on this editorial/opinion/news alert. Since 1993 millions of individuals have been helped by Factnet. To see Factnet’s mission, click here. To share your personal experiences or opinions, go to one of our many various message boards at .  If you have something you would like Factnet to consider posting in our editorial/opinion/news story email it to . Put “Factnet Story Submission” in the subject line so it gets to the proper editors. FACTNet is a 501(c)(3) non profit organization. F.A.C.T.Net, Inc. PO Box 1315 , Ignacio, CO. 81137 USA, E-mail:

Premium Drupal Themes by Adaptivethemes
escort marseille