Is anyone here?

[smyrna]

You know, it's funny,

But in times past, the SC had a small group of detractors here that were very vocal in their opposition. In fact, it became a collective, redundant tirade of the same accusations over and over.

They would accuse, and we would respond, and always be victorius over their allegations. They were unfounded, based upon fallacy, their own rumors and misrepresentations of what the SC teaches.

Virtually all of the SC critics on the web do the same thing.

What I have found highly amusing, is that I don't see them anywhere now except on a couple of extremely obscure websites.

In the meantime, their has been an expansion of SC friendly fellowship groups.

It boils down to conviction. You'd think that, based upon their tenacity on this site in times past, they'd see the pay to post program as being just a necessary aspect to deal with in their campaign and their agenda.

But none of them chose to pay the few dollars to continue their jihad. So it is natural to question whether they really were concerned about the SC or was it just a case of damaged egos attempting to redeeem themselves? Did they really think by bringing up the same arguments over and over that the outcome would be any different?

Every time they did the result was the same, but they continued to act as if those issues were never argued out.

The serpent seed teaching alone accounted for literally thousands of posts, and they still speak of it today, and they still misrepresent what is taught, they still apply their own spin to it, they still try and mischaracterize those who believe it.

But that they do it on some obscure, outdated websites (in the case of Bill Alnor's Cultlink.com) brings us as SC students comfort in knowing they have lost their zeal to continue their smear campaigns.

[dodge]

Hi Smyrna. Trolling for detractors, I see. No bites? Not even a nibble? That’s so sad. If I run into a critic of Arnold Murray, Shepherds Chapel or Kenites I’ll let them know that you’re lonely and need someone to play with. In the meantime you can reminisce about your glory days here by dredging up threads from the past, dusting them off, and remembering how you used to stomp critics like an old soldier telling war stories.

[smyrna]

Well Dodge, I can certainly characterize your presence here today as likened to one member of a school of hungry goldfish when you sprinkle their food into a tank. They will grab at anything and everything. I guess boredom has set in, since I can see you are all over the FactNet boards, regardless of the topic.

Perhaps you can come to terms with your AADD. Maybe this link will help you:

http://www.mental-health-matters.com...article&id=238

I'll give you this credit though: at least you recognized that I did experience "glory days" and how the critics were definitely stomped, not by me, but by their own words and actions. The other students, as well as myself, merely pointed that out.

You are merely fooling yourself by thinking I am "trolling" for detractors. Actually, I just stopped by in between trading silver options, to see if Truth_child answered my reply to his initial personal message.

[smyrna]

Speechless, Dodge? Very uncharacteristic of you. I see you posted on the 'Idiots In America' thread, (an appropriate venue for you, may I add)about four hours after your silly post here.

Yes, the second time I read your post, the more ridiculous it appeared to me. Because the post you responded to made it quite clear the detractors spent a great deal of time repeating themselves, to no avail.

So why would you think I'd want to go yet another round of their same redundant but ineffectual and invalid arguments?

I guess you weren't reading on the Cultblunders and Shepherd's Chapel II thread, when "agent1" appeared. It was the same thing again, and the same result.

Despite all their redundant and boisterous tirades, "poof" they were gone again, without winning any argument, just as so many times before.

So bark up another tree Dodge, because it ain't working here.

[turtle]

Science can trace dna evidence to two people. It has scientifically been proven. However one problem. Noah son's wives would of been from a different people perhaps. So genetic links go all the way back to adam and eve

[orthodox]

Turtle, tracing DNA backwards to two people means we can trace contemporary DNA that SURVIVED in COMMON from two individuals. It does not mean there was only a Adam and Eve. All thoroughbred horses trace to 4 imported studs, but not all the horses of their breeding. The story of Noah, like so many other OT books was borrowed from an older story of a great flood in Mesopotamia.
The rabbis thought it a wonderfull lesson, and indeed it is.
My avocation, archaeology has found direct evidence for many of the places and events in the Bible.There is a quarterly journal 'Biblical Archaeology' which I highly recommend.
Once again, the 'Bible' whichever version you use, is a text written by men and inspired by God. Well, I have my questions on the inspiration for some of the unreadable modern versions that sound like out of work Hollywood soap opera writers did it.
You are eating the menu and missing the meal.

[turtle]

Turtle, tracing DNA backwards to two people means we can trace contemporary DNA that SURVIVED in COMMON from two individuals. It does not mean there was only a Adam and Eve. All thoroughbred horses trace to 4 imported studs, but not all the horses of their breeding. The story of Noah, like so many other OT books was borrowed from an older story of a great flood in Mesopotamia.
The rabbis thought it a wonderfull lesson, and indeed it is.
My avocation, archaeology has found direct evidence for many of the places and events in the Bible.There is a quarterly journal 'Biblical Archaeology' which I highly recommend.
Once again, the 'Bible' whichever version you use, is a text written by men and inspired by God. Well, I have my questions on the inspiration for some of the unreadable modern versions that sound like out of work Hollywood soap opera writers did it.
You are eating the menu and missing the meal.

Do you own research do not take my word on it. If you do not believe the Bible look at scientific fact. You would not believe a billy goat, if he fell off a wall, and landed in a pool of mud only to find it falling away from himself.

[orthodox]

I do wish you would be consistent. When science goes against your heresies it's false, ie Evolution. When it fits in nicely with your cult you do everything but put on a white lab coat.

[turtle]

Who needs the lab coat, you nuts are around.

[smyrna]

Did I miss something? All of a sudden, some discussion about DNA pops up out of nowhere.

Amazing.

[turtle]

Smyrna read the last few pages if you got it in page mode. lol. However my grammer seems to get worse by the minute. lol. However smyrna, one has to remember two things and two things for sure Scientific evidence has back and is still backing the Bible today.

[truth_child]

so now you are one here as turtle

[terluvire]

Did I miss something? All of a sudden, some discussion about DNA pops up out of nowhere.

Amazing.

LOL! the fun starts again!

[smyrna]

Hi Ter,

Who knows what Turtle means by "page mode"? Does that relate to "ala mode" LOL! In her world, I wouldn't be surprised.

But speaking of DNA, I'd say the detractors were short changed. They appear to not have a genetic disposition to be able to use common sense! I guess they are victims of those "genetic mistakes" they believe God made! LOL!

[turtle]

Display mode and no God did not cause genetic problems. However because of our sin it caused genetic problems. Proof Lamentation 8, realize it must come from a nation and not one person. Meaning a tribe. Egypt was laiden with sin of idolatry, Hebrews had been there, what was their skin coloring white no egyptians were white. What color were the phoncians and Assyrians and the turks? All had sin problems all. Most of these nation were idolaters, even Abraham came from Idolatrous nation. No pure race. Just like no pure language. Language changes. Towere of babel people were scattered, all interpeted it differently.

[turtle]

Genesis 11:26-28 KJV
(26) And Terah lived seventy years, and begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran.
(27) Now these are the generations of Terah: Terah begat Abram, Nahor, and Haran; and Haran begat Lot.
(28) And Haran died before his father Terah in the land of his nativity, in Ur of the Chaldees.

Joshua 24:2 KJV
(2) And Joshua said unto all the people, Thus saith the LORD God of Israel, Your fathers dwelt on the other side of the flood in old time, even Terah, the father of Abraham, and the father of Nachor: and they served other gods.

[turtle]

I do wish you would be consistent. When science goes against your heresies it's false, ie Evolution. When it fits in nicely with your cult you do everything but put on a white lab coat.

Yeah I finally figure out who you are. lol. The old gang. However I have to ask you one thing do you not know blood covers everything Christ blood covers sin, all sin, but it does not mean one will not be punished for a crime.

[turtle]

so now you are one here as turtle

sorry but you see I told them if they wanted me on there they have to either change my name themselves or have to let in as I was, because their rules had changed. I could not get on any other way. They had no problem with that. They understood.

Now to answer your question, did you not know TC? If you did not I am laughing very hard.

[smyrna]

Hey Ter,

Turtle's turning out to be a bigger racist than "Aryan". She's also claiming that skin color is a "genetic problem."

"However because of our sin it caused genetic problems. Proof Lamentation 8, realize it must come from a nation and not one person. Meaning a tribe. Egypt was laiden with sin of idolatry, Hebrews had been there, what was their skin coloring white no egyptians were white. What color were the phoncians and Assyrians and the turks? All had sin problems all."

This is hilarious! The detractors have made every single racist comment on this entire SC board, and yet they call SC students racists! Too much!

[orthodox]

I see a family of third world phoncians move in and I'm burning a cross.
" Play that phonican music white boy, play that phoncian music yeaaa!"