Reply With Quote?Originally Posted by eaglebeak
I haven't gone anywhere Molly. It is just the same few people posting here and the same posts all the time for years.
Paid Member
A Mel Brooks moment here? Has anyone thought of how funny it is that the cult has a card table shrine with a big Hitler mustache while people drive by and see what to them may look like a Sieg Heil from the LYM to support the NAWAPA Party ?
http://wayland.patch.com/articles/de...#photo-9794440
Ciampion This really is scary to watch at that 21 minute mark. If you continue for a few more minutes you can see that Larouche is cunningly spreading his paranoid delusions to the remaining members who seem like props in a cheap zombie movie. Kesha looks like she is ready to hunt for brains on the streets of Houston.
From the latest Discussion with the Larouche Slate (WE MISS YOU SUMMER!!!!):
http://larouchepac.com/node/22628
At about 21:00, after a few minutes of talking again, in particularly ego-maniacal fashion, about his past successes in forecasting and the SDI victory and his continual persecution by his enemies, you can hear Larouche utter the following: "The Obama administration has been running operations against me for years, especially since 1989."
Listen to him for a few minutes before and after that if you have the time. It's getting scary.
Here is what is going on for the remaining LYM and LYMettes who tune in here.
Larouche has a very simple cheap parlor trick here to use on members who are now passing their first decade of "volunteer" service. Boy those 10 years went by real fast didn't they? After devoting from 30 to 50 percent of your young adult life to what you think is the world's greatest economist and genius Larouche you may begin to wonder how come the rest of the planet has not embraced him the way you have. This is not like the era many of us were in since we have the Internet capable of providing instant feedback and coverage from anywhere in the globe about the cult. This also means that unlike say the "Our Town" series about us in a weekly NYC paper in the late 1970s early 1980s, you can't just send LCers to collect those issues and try to hide them from the public and above all, the membership.
A few posts ago the King book was mentioned after a purchase. For years I never read the King book because of what was said about him as well as guessing that it was 100% lies anyway. After I left I wanted to forget the whole lunacy and move on with my life which worked for several years until one day I went to a used bookstore in a local flea market. Browsing the books I accidentally dropped a prior purchase and when I went to retrieve it I found my self facing the King book at the bottom shelf with a $1.99 price tag on it. Being a bargain hunter, I could not resist and purchased the book. I could not put the book down when I got home and learned more about the cult and Larouche while also finding out things I had no idea happened. On the other hand, I had disagreements with King over several issues based on my being in the LC which make me understand why some ex members have no love for him.
For the LYM and LYMettes, this is completely foreign to them and over the years if you read the thousands of posts here you will see how the history of Larouche and the LC has been rewritten to both delude members who stayed in while creating an enhanced version of our crimes by making Larouche a political prisoner to the new LYM.
The problem is that after a decade or more of life in the cult, a member may ask themselves how come the rest of the world does not see Larouche the way the members do. That same member may also ask themselves if there really is this incredible secret world of "elites" who hang on every word that Larouche speaks, writes or webcast er skypes, how come they are still card table shrining or in a smelly boiler room doing the same rotation of The Larouche Trinity of Terror?
Thermo Nuclear War
New Dark Ages
Economic collapse.
It never ends and as you approach your late 20s and pass them, members end up questioning and leaving the way scores of members the same way did in the past.
What Larouche is doing is quite simple. He is transforming the rejection of the cult and himself by telling the remaining flock that it is outside forces of eeeevil who are stopping them. In this great LPAC video you can clearly see him telling blank eyed members that HIS enemies are now YOUR enemies and you would be in power if not for the collected galactic forces being sent against you because of how dangerous you now are. This also explains why he is not in power since this ready made enemy, not Larouche's delusions is the deciding factor.
This really is cult 101 and plenty of cults will do the same trick to get their members to become more inner oriented and ignore critical thinking. Larouche wants you paranoid
Our crucial experiment here.
This is a very unique site for members to discover and read. Many a time I have tuned in and have seen dozens of people viewing and a hundred or more at various times. This is what I think is so fascinating to look at.
The members view the LPAC video of Larouche telling them that it is the outside forces of eeevil which have been unleashed to stop them . The members are the only thing which separates humanity's survival from destruction. The survival of the human species depends on their (Larouche's praise) message. If they are not running the globe and complaining about card table shrining 4life. don't blame the fact that you are in nothing but a vanity project for Lyn.
What really happens?
If you review the last several years of factnet you can't help but notice that Larouche and the cult are not being blacked out and the words of Larouche are quite well known. With the help of a simple tool like google search, each day we find mention of Larouche and the cult. We find hundreds and hundreds of encounters between the cult and non cult members. We find hundreds of pictures of card table shrines and cult members taken by outsiders using their cell phones and posted the same day or even the same hour. We find hundreds of videos of card table shrines scattered around YouTube and on blogs about meeting Larouchies. Indeed, the word Larouchie, cult and card table shrine all came from encounters with LC and LYM members.
That whole fabricated fiction by Larouche and the cult which chose to deny what was said or printed about The Jews, The Holocaust, Obama's father swinging from a tree in Africa, gas chambers in America, mass starvation occurring 2 months ago and so on and so forth can be revisited with simple web searches. Court trial transcripts can be accessed and read instead of hidden in Babs hideaway. The deaths of members can't be hidden 100% and it can become quite a shock to new members to see that they are following the exact same script which the previous incarnations of the LC followed, all directed by Larouche and the pretty demented NCs enforcing the circus.
It never occurs that maybe it is because of Larouche that they get nowhere and maybe he is nuts, but smart enough to run a cult that they just blew 10 years in. In what could be a fascinating philosophical course paradox study, you are all part of something Larouche where the more you promote Larouche, the more you anti promote Larouche!
In fact, based on the years and years of Factnet.org posts, there has never been a time where more Larouche has been out there for examination in my memory. Dining room Table Rachel Brown's video with Barney Frank has been viewed by maybe 3 million if you add up all of the sites. Larouche as I have shown repeatedly is part of the culture. When you wish to really describe someone as nuts, Larouche has gone from presidential candidate to being an adjective! All of the LYM and LYMettes along with the leftover LCers are part of a long term history project here which can be studied and used not by economics or science students, but cult and sociology researchers. In a few years we will have 4 decade elderly LCers card table shrining with newer LYM and LYMettes while Larouche smiles.
On the other hand I would think that talented LYM members who leave may find that their talents can be valuable in many places for a real life the same way that many members who left in the past have found.
Larouche is right 2012!
-With all of the hoopla over the cult's "UPO" candidate Cheminade in France, we finally see the net result.
http://www.city-journal.org/2012/eon0506gs.html
....On April 22, the elections’ first round, French voters were free to choose from among ten contenders, including Trotskyists, radical ecologists, and a representative of America’s Lyndon Larouche cult..
-The Larouche hegemony role continues in Michigan. I can see the cult carpetbegging with this.
http://www.ballot-access.org/2012/05...a-libertarian/
..The Libertarian Party will sue, if the Secretary of State does not change her mind. The potential lawsuit will be bolstered by a Sixth Circuit order in LaRouche v Austin, issued on August 31, 1984. That order required the Secretary of State to print Lyndon LaRouche’s name on the November 1984 ballot as an independent presidential candidate, even though he had run in the Michigan Democratic presidential primary that year. ..
-The cult continues to carpetbeg from the Ron Paul genre, but is brings up something that 330 million dollars can't seem to stop. Larouche is quickly forgotten here,
http://www.democraticunderground.com/1002650662
-A mention of Larouche by Joel Bellman
Anyone notice that Ron Paul supporters are eerily similar to the Lyndon Larouche supporters?
I can remember the LaRouchies during the 70,s and 80's and they remind me of the Paulites of today.
Both Larouche and Paul are conspiracy theorists and are very good at luring ignorant idealists from the left and the right.
I don't believe in coincidences like this.
Don
They attract similar personality types.
They both attract the schizotypal paranoid conspiracy theorist types..........
Yep. They remind me of Scientologists, too.
I watch BookTv on the weekends to try to keep up with what is being published. Just about every weekend some RP supporter interrupts the Q&A session with some wildly off topic question, rudely interrupting the whole event. And there are usually two or three of them.
http://www.laobserved.com/intell/201...charles_hi.php
...
As I was wrapping up my interview with Higham, he offhandedly asked me if I'd interviewed Welles himself for the piece. "Oh, God, no," I said, dismissing the possibility. "I can't imagine he'd agree to do something like this. He doesn't know who I am, and I don't know anyone who knows him." Higham replied, "You should do it. At least try. He's staying here in town at a house in the (Hollywood) Hills close by."
As I pondered our conversation later, I began to think, "Yeah - what the hell? What have I got to lose? Why don't I?" I made a mental note to follow up.
The following week, as it turned out, based on some previous investigative reporting I had done, I was subpoenaed to testify as an expert witness in a civil lawsuit brought against the Lyndon LaRouche political cult. After almost two full days on the stand, getting pounded in cross-examination by the LaRouche attorney - an aggressive former prosecutor - I was exhausted and anxious to get back to my documentary.
As I was about to pull out of the parking lot, I snapped on KNX for a quick news update, only to hear: "Actor-director Orson Welles was found dead today in the Hollywood Hills home where he had recently been staying. Officials said he had suffered an apparent heart attack, and died alone. Welles, 70, was best known..."
This is a review of the King Book by Bellman in the LA Herald Examiner in 1989 to get your bearings
A FASCIST WRAPPED IN OLD GLORY
Los Angeles Herald Examiner, April 18, 1989
By JOEL BELLMAN
When I began looking into the activities of political extremist and cult leader Lyndon LaRouche for a radio documentary I was producing in 1981, the work of journalist Dennis King was already legendary among seasoned LaRouche-watchers.
At the time, little had been published in the mainstream media about LaRouche and his shadowy network, which was just beginning to recruit and organize on the West Coast and here in Los Angeles. But the group was firmly established in New York, and King's 1979 investigative series for the Manhattan weekly Our Town had quickly become the standard reference on the subject.
As one of the first journalists to break the LaRouche story, he has now written the book that will surely be the hallmark work: Lyndon LaRouche and the New American Fascism (Doubleday).
For more than a decade, King has endured more lawsuits, more libelous and slanderous personal attacks, more unrelenting 24-hour intimidation, dirty tricks and physical threats than any other reporter who tried to reveal the truth about LaRouche's neo-Nazi organization.
Long before I met him or even read his Our Town series, the first LaRouche cult member I interviewed demanded to know "if Dennis King had been feeding me stuff." When I eventually did speak to King on the phone from New York, I expressed amazement that he had a listed number, considering all the harassment. "There's no point in unlisting it," he said wearily. "Every time I change it, they find out the new one within a day or two. They've got contacts inside the phone company."
It's tempting to dismiss such comments as misplaced melodrama, but they accurately describe an occupational hazard of covering this story. I've seen the countless LaRouche news interviews, public addresses, paid advertisements and published propaganda that have attempted to smear King and destroy the credibility of his work. And I've shared his frustration at the indifference of mainstream editors who just wouldn't believe that the most sophisticated political extremist group in modern times was a story worth reporting.
Despite all that--or perhaps because of it--King has come closer than anyone else to unraveling the mystery of how LaRouche, now serving time in federal prison for tax evasion and conspiracy to commit loan fraud, was able to get away with it for so long. His book chronicles time after time when prosecuting agencies, political parties and even the press simply failed to recognize or act on the danger to democracy posed by LaRouche and his minions.
The broad outlines of the saga are by now familiar, and King sketches them deftly, filling in the picture with rich detail: LaRouche's long involvement on the radical left beginning with the Socialist Workers Party in the late 1940s and extending on through the Students for a Democratic Society in the late 1960s; gradual formation of a breakaway leftist sect in the early 1970s, followed by a sharp lurch to a far-right ideology modeled closely on classical fascism, laced with racism, anti-Semitism and demented conspiracy theories; and finally, the creation of a private intelligence service, publishing and financial empire, electoral organization and political network girding the globe.
King's book is alive with anecdotes, both amusing and frightening, of how LaRouche's various megalomaniacal schemes played themselves out. But where it's most valuable is in supplying what until now has been missing from most accounts of the LaRouche phenomenon, including my own: A systematic analysis of his political program, not as an arbitrary assortment of obsessions conjured up by a clinical psychotic, but as a fiendishly clever and coherent strategy, a "grand design" aimed at achieving world conquest.
This is not to argue that LaRouche, on some level, isn't insane. Most of us who've followed his career closely believe he is. The Nazi "big lie" propaganda technique depended on repeating an untruth so outrageous that eventually it came to be believed. The success of LaRouche's plan hinges on precisely the opposite. It is, in reality, a gigantic worldwide conspiracy so elaborate and audacious that almost nobody has taken it seriously. And it can only succeed as long as we don't give it serious attention.
Uncovering the LaRouche story has been a fascinating and frightening experience for all of us, and not only for the reasons commonly supposed. LaRouche's penchant for lawsuits is famous, and even the fear of getting sued has successfully squelched countless investigative exposes of his organization. As a sociopathic personality, he has a well-deserved reputation for sadistic cruelty toward his own followers, employed as part of his cult-indoctrination techniques, as well as a single-minded ruthlessness in hounding his political enemies.
But there's also another kind of fear that sooner or later takes hold of everyone who gets hooked by this story: As you read more of LaRouche's many publications--which is essential, after all, to understanding his motivations--you cannot escape the terrifying sense that at some point you, too, run the risk of losing your grip on reality as you get sucked deeper into LaRouche’s madness. As in all effective propaganda, threads of truth are densely woven into its fabric, and trying to unravel them is mentally and physically exhausting. It becomes as much a battle to keep your own perspective as it does to comprehend the lunacy of the LaRouche world.
Doesn't the fact that LaRouche ended up behind bars ultimately prove that the system works? Not at all. As King observes, if LaRouche's criminal convictions finally put an end to his political career, it will be due not to the strength of grass-roots resistance to fascist ideologies but, paradoxically, to its weakness. That vulnerability encouraged the kind of recklessness and rampant fund-raising fraud that eventually caused LaRouche's entire scheme to unwind.
The case of Lyndon LaRouche is a cautionary tale of how American institutions collectively failed to confront and counter a dangerously subversive political movement. Could it happen again? Indeed, it's still happening.
-Keash and the cult make The Democratic Underground. This is a good example LYM members of where Larouche tells you that his and now your enemies are out to get you while it is Larouche and the cult itself which your enemy. Real Bizarro World when you run as Democrats and the Democratic party wants nothing to do with you. Boy that could make a great paper for class.
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10782568
Beating Kesha Rogers - Congressional District 22
Email I was forwarded by my Precinct Chair (south of Houston - precinct 60 now)
By Chairman Steve Brown
What if I told you that a candidate in the Democratic Primary would like to have President Barack Obama impeached? What if I told you that she’s a thirty-something, photogenic and articulate African American woman? Finally, what if I told you that two years ago she actually won the Democratic nomination for Congressional District 22, and went on to enter the general election by viciously attacking our President? If you are not already aware of this person, then let me introduce you to Kesha Rogers.
Rogers is a member of a political cult led by Lyndon LaRouche. LaRouche’s main goal is to elect Members of Congress who will advocate for the colonization of the moon, the impeachment of President Obama, and the restoration of an obscure 1933 banking standard.
Over the years, this cult has joined forces with a number of unseemly and racially divisive organizations, like the Ku Klux Klan.
In fact, LaRouche himself has been known to spew anti-sematic and racist views throughout the years. In newsletters he wrote in 1973 and 1974, he characterizes Black women as “sadistic,” and young Black men as “zombie killers out of control.” LaRouche’s racism isn’t just limited to African Americans. He refers to Asians as “subhuman” and Hispanics as “miserable.”
However, he saves a great deal of his venom to vilify President Barack Obama. In 2009 he compared Pres. Obama to a trained monkey by stating, “And we have a dictatorship in the United States…under a President who doesn't have much conscience, because he doesn't have any brains. He's trained to talk like a trained monkey or something out of a mechanical zoo."
Rogers has adopted this type of hate speech in her current campaign. In a recent YouTube clip on her website, she suggests that Pres. Obama’s doctor should, “administer some pentothal of sodium” on him. Pentothal is an ingredient commonly used in lethal injections.
I hope and trust that the appropriate federal authorities are keeping a close watch on this cult, as any insinuations about the assassination of our President should be handled with the utmost urgency and seriousness,especially by those who not only wish him harm but hold other dangerous ideas.
As Democrats, we cannot afford for anyone representing LaRouche’s cult to be a nominee on the Democratic ballot. A Rogers’ victory on May 29 is not only a distraction for those of us working hard to re-elect President Obama, but it also hurts our local, qualified candidates who need a surge in straight-ticket voting during the general election. Everyone, from judicial candidates to state representatives, should be concerned about sharing the Democratic slate with Rogers.
Voters in Congressional District 22 have a choice. KP George is running against Rogers on a platform to work with Pres. Obama on improving the economy, keeping our shores safe and providing health care for all. KP is the only Democrat in this race, and he’s ready to serve.
So, why would Rogers choose to align with LaRouche? I can’t say. Perhaps you should ask her if you ever meet her.
But as Texas Democrats, we must develop protocols to ensure that “Democratic” imposters don’t find their way on our ballot. By doing so, we protect the integrity of the Democratic primary while also ensuring that our voters don’t become fooled by candidates that don’t represent their interests.
In the meantime, we can use this election to send a message to any future LaRouche candidate by convincingly defeating Kesha Rogers on May 29, 2012. Our President would appreciate it.
Steve Brown is the Chairman of the Fort Bend County Democratic Party
I live in Fort Bend County and I am worried about Kesha
I live in Fort Bend County and was at the County Executive Committee meeting when they drew for Ballots. Kesha is a nut case and scares me. I am a precinct chair and was happy to vote to support KP George against Kesha..
I moved to Texas about 8 years ago and really don't
follow the local races. But a few months ago someone posted in this forum about the LaRouche's so I thought I'd put this up for anyone else who didn't see it. I was a precinct chair in 2008 when I volunteered for the campaign. I usually just vote straight dem but now I have to pay attention so I don't inadvertently vote for someone like this.
xlcr4life@hotmail.com
?
I haven't gone anywhere Molly. It is just the same few people posting here and the same posts all the time for years.
Senior Member
That's definitely a fair bit different than the usual LaRouche. Sounds more like the paranoid LaRouche of (perhaps not coincidentally) 1989.
What is notable that he doesn't even indicate that he screwed up in-re "Obama" and "1989." He says it as forthrightly as if he was noting the blue nature of the sky. Either his attempts to boost his own ego during that moment made him feel he didn't need to correct such an obvious mistake, or he's going senile.
Last edited by Kellezi; 05-11-2012 at 11:06 AM.
Paid Member
All hail Grand Mystic Poohba Larouche!!
Originally Posted by Ciampion
At about 21:00, after a few minutes of talking again, in particularly ego-maniacal fashion, about his past successes in forecasting and the SDI victory and his continual persecution by his enemies, you can hear Larouche utter the following: "The Obama administration has been running operations against me for years, especially since 1989."
Listen to him for a few minutes before and after that if you have the time. It's getting scary.I think that we must stop the press blackout of Larouche as this is as important as his October 2011 webcast about Obama building gas chambers on US Soil and how mass starvation due to food shortages would kill off billions by Spring of 2012.Originally posted by Kellezi. That's definitely a fair bit different than the usual LaRouche. Sounds more like the paranoid LaRouche of (perhaps not coincidentally) 1989.
What is notable that he doesn't even indicate that he screwed up in-re "Obama" and "1989." He says it as forthrightly as if he was noting the blue nature of the sky. Either his attempts to boost his own ego during that moment made him feel he didn't need to correct such an obvious mistake, or he's going senile.
Above all, the LYM and Lymettes should know that Obama has been launching operations against Larouche since the day most of you were born in 1989. 1989 I believe was when Larouche was sent to the "Big House" which was a Federal prison and not Club Ibykus. To assist everyone, we find that there are places to hear and watch Larouche if you ever find yourself wondering why the past 10 years went by so fast and why the next 10 to 30 will also.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVlaK...hannel&list=UL
http://onpointpolitics.com/2012/05/l...me-since-1989/
Larouche: “The Obama administration has been running operations against me… since 1989.”
Larouche: “The Obama administration has been running operations against me for years, especially since 1989.” (larouchepac.com May 8, 2012) Note: Obama was at the time a 28 year old law school intern at the law office of Sidley Austin in Chicago. It was there that Obama met his future wife Michelle who was an employee of the firm.
Some strange things here at LPAC from a Kesha release.
http://larouchepac.com/node/22644
We have 6 points on the map of the USA at the top for the cult slate but only 5 members shown on the side bar. In addition, Summer Shields picture is missing as well as Robert Lauten. What would be funny is if candidate Robert Lauten got his 20 K he gave us over the years back by raising money from HIS campaign site in a John Birch Society operation.
Heading to Kesha's release we see that the Larouche Svengali trick on Kesha is working as she can't see her self and the cult with Larouche appearing bat $hit crazy to outsiders, but part of a massive British operation.
This is a great line of delusion by Kesha.
..But this is our party, not theirs. We represent the Democratic Party of Franklin Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon LaRouche.
But notice these two lines about the local Fort Bend Democratic Party as Obama was interviewed about gay marriage around the same time.
.."Perhaps it were more appropriate to refer to them as the Fort Bend-over Democrats! "
......Fort Bend-over County Chairman Steve Brown...
Hmmm, sounds like a conference call with Larouche.
Howie has a new entry in his "The Larouche Challenge" for your enjoyment. As usual, go to the page to access the links he has posted.
http://www.struat.com/election/2012/...video/#respond
EXCITING Kesha Rogers VERSUS KP GEORGE Campaign NEWS. THINGS ARE HEATING UP DOWN THERE IN TEXAS.
THE RACE OF THE CENTURY: KP GEORGE VERSUS KESHA ROGERS; Texas 22
NOT A LEMONADE STAND
I believe the top pic is illegal. Campaigning on government property –OOOh. Hardball Politics, eh?
The Kesha Rogers campaign has been ROCKED TO THE BONES by the reposting of a campaign video onto the GOOGLE NEWS AGGREGATED media outlet “Burnt Orange” under the headline Kesha Rogers Calls for Execution of President in Campaign Video. The point of contention comes in the dual use of the reference to Obama needing a dose of ”pentothal of sodium” — which the Kesha Rogers campaign maintains is used in truth serum, and her detractors point out is “usually the first of three drugs administered during most lethal injections in the United States”.
The blog post has made its way to various outlets, most notably some sketchy spam blogs related to the popular music sensation Ke$ha, and the point of controversy has been picked up into a message emailed to local Democrats by Fort Bend Democratic chair Stephen Brown, Also found here. And some additional comments here: Getting further with the Democratic Grass-roots:
Gothmog: I live in Fort Bend County and was at the County Executive Committee meeting when they drew for Ballots. Kesha is a nut case and scares me. I am a precinct chair and was happy to vote to support KP George against Kesha.
TBF: I was a precinct chair in 2008 when I volunteered for the campaign. I usually just vote straight dem but now I have to pay attention so I don’t inadvertently vote for someone like this.
The Kesha Rogers campaign has posted on its campaign website and onto burnt orange, a response that reads, in part: Any talk of assassinating the President is to be condemned and prosecuted, in my view, because it is morally reprehensible and would unleash a form of social chaos in this country from which it is doubtful we would ever recover.
If you are not crazy but are simply malevolent, you betray yourself as a flack for the Democratic Party or the Obama campaign, engaged in the most despicable kind of dirty tricks against my campaign. Kindly cease and desist.
A commenter at burnt orange,LSadun FIRED BACK: It’s hilarious to see you calling KT “crazy or malevolent”. Those are exactly the words I’d use to describe your video. Not the sodium pentathol line (which can be read either as referring to truth serum or to an execution drug), but the nastiness and absurdity of the entire video. A couple of months ago I walked past some LaRouchites who were pushing literature at a (DC) subway station behind a poster of Obama with a Hitler mustache. What I said then applies equally well now You’ve got a First Amendment right to peddle your filth, but it’s still filth.
Hm. There is a parallel with the Australian CEC Glenn Isherwood Noose-waving incident that comes in play here. Just what is a waving of a noose suppose to mean here?
The actual history of the Larouche Movement, and by extension the Kesha Rogers campaign, concerning the topic of the Assassination of Barack Obama would make for a fascinating study. Suffice it to say, the Larouchies believe that the British Empire has it in the back-pocket as a possible tactic should their puppet (Obama) become expendable, and if a lone nutcase were to be the culprit, perhaps responding to a pronouncement along the lines of “Obama should back down or he might be hung“, that would just be proof of the British Emprie’s psychological manipulations.
Larouche and Obama, it should be noted, go way back:
From the latest Discussion with the Larouche Slate
http://larouchepac.com/node/22628
At about 21:00, after a few minutes of talking again, in particularly ego-maniacal fashion, about his past successes in forecasting and the SDI victory and his continual persecution by his enemies, you can hear Larouche utter the following: “The Obama administration has been running operations against me for years, especially since 1989.” (Hey! Somebody is paying attention! Check this link out here. Ala Laroucheplanet, I see.)
The message from Fort Bend Democratic chair Stephen Brown is deserving of a longer look. The “restoration of an obscure 1933 banking standard” is, I believe, a worthwhile cause, though it’s hard to see it as at the complete expense of anything else. I do not believe that their “main goal is to elect Members of Congress” (I don’t think they give a rats’ ass about the idea), but it may not be worth quibbling over. But I do find this interesting:
A Rogers’ victory on May 29 is not only a distraction for those of us working hard to re-elect PresidentObama, but it also hurts our local, qualified candidates who need a surge in straight-ticket voting during the general election. Everyone, from judicial candidates to state representatives, should be concerned about sharing the Democratic slate with Rogers.
Without saying it bluntly, it is an admission of a simple fact that Democrats in the district know, and it’s not worth pretending otherwise: a Republican Incumbent is going to win the race. What we’re left with from there is an uncomfortably uninspiring pitch, but a true one, that hampering this ledger in the long slate of Democratic candidacies would harm candidacies above this position on the state level and below it on the local level.
So we have this note from the Fort Bend Star: Please remember the name and vote for anyone but. It is KP George.
And message from DU: Seriously. All of the laDouche people are sick. We have made it very clear to our delegates to stay away from them. Don’t engage. Don’t listen to them sing. They are like mermaids luring you into a life of a cult. These people are extremely strange and just f*&^ing sick bastards. keep your distance. Treat them like a dog humping your leg and just let them finish.
In other Kesha Rogers campaign news:
KESHA ROGERS PIGGY-BACKS ON KEITH JUDD‘s WEST VIRGINIA DEMOCRACTIC PRIMARY PERFORMANCE
Study the 2008 map of where Obama did better than Kerry in blue and McCain did better than Bush in red, found here. The red streak is where Obama will get some embarrassing Primary results.
From a campaign statement: But this is our party, not theirs. We represent the Democratic Party of Franklin Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon LaRouche, which they have abandoned, preferring instead the pro-Wall Street, anti-Constitutional policies of George W. Bush! But Obama has not yet abolished elections — though he might want to, after having four in ten Democrats vote against him in the West Virginia primary — and has not yet taken away your right to vote.
Nay. Editing job quickly: We represent the Democratic Party of Franklin Roosevelt, John F. Kennedy and Lyndon LaRouche and Keith Judd. There you go.
Simply put, this battle represents one between the Keith Judd / Lyndon Larouche / Alvin Greene Democrats and the Adlai Stevenson / Lloyd Bentsen / Barack Obama Democrats. No, that last set is not my favorite set of Democrats, but it beats the first set!
STORY NUMBER TWO: WHERE ARE YOU, SUMMER SHIELDS, 8th District CALIFORNIA?
Well this is mighty interesting. Summer Shields has disappeared from the “Slate of Six” candidates. And the Larouche Candidate roundtables now holds the 5 candidates, instead of 6. What this means, we can only speculate:
Maybe future EIR issues, when reminiscing about the wonderful words of LaRouche on the occasion of (insert circa 2009-2011 Weekly Report stuff), will Photoshop Sky Shields out of old screencaps.
“And then both Cerretani and Hoefle laughed at LaRouche’s marvelous joke about chimpanzees. In this Weekly Report the three had discussed a great many things vital to humanity as we know it…” as the western portion of the table looks suspiciously empty.
Summer Shields, who won praise from radio host Michael Savage in his 2010 effort unseat Nancy Pelosi, only to win not a single vote due to not getting on the ballot — is joined in disappearing with Sky Shields, who once sat by an awkward joke about monkeys and was then seemingly given the reward of John Hoefel’s seat position.
STORY NUMBER THREE: DIANE SARE, NEW JERSEY 5… DEBATE TIME As always, I’d be surprised if she won, but the Democrats in this district should proceed with weariness… consult Texas 22.
NEW DEBATE IN NEW JERSEY Following the abrupt withdrawal of Teaneck Deputy Mayor Adam Gussen from the Bergen Grassroots CD 5 Democratic debate with Jason Castle and La Rouche candidate Diane Sare two weeks ago, a new debate will be hosted by the Teaneck Municipal Democratic Committee on May 20 from 3 to 5 PM at the Rhoda Center in Teaneck. Marine veteran Jason Castle said, “I am happy that the voters of the district will have the opportunity to see all of the candidates present and contrast their platforms.”
Location: the Rodda Center, Room # MP1, 250 Colonial Ct, Teaneck, NJ. Time: 3 PM to 5 PM
The Candidates attending will be Jason Castle, Adam Gussen, Diane Sare.
Sigh. To Laura I. Zucker Teaneck Democratic Municipal Chair (or whoever) … feel free to host a debate between Castle and Gussen, sans Sare. But if Sare has to be in the debate, be sure to delve along the lines of, like, these silly things regarding Themonuclear War.
In the other campaign slate news:for Massachusetts 4, Rachel Brown’s campaign website now features a sterling picture of John F Kennedy — pointing to a NAWAPA video. She is running against a Kennedy. Rachel Brown will also be marching in a parade on Sunday, May 20, 2012 – 1:00pm to 3:00pm. Bill Roberts shows himself delivering the paperwork for Michigan 11. And Dave Christie is all about NAWAPA:
Congressional Candidates Dave Christie (WA-9) and Bill Roberts (MI-11) sat down with NAWAPA XXI principal author Michael Kirsch to discuss the importance of Dave and Bill’s upcoming tour of crucial regions of the NAWAPA XXI project.
Thought of the day: Canada pretty much vetoed the proposition, taking it as a wholesale grabbing of their natural resources. In order to get this thing moving forward, the Canadian Larouche Team is going to have to pull their weight, and probably won’t be of any use to rail against Obama.
Other campaign highlights: Be not deceived. Obama’s full frontal attack on the Supreme Court is nothing less than the final phase of his “Hitler dictatorship.” Obama has now effectively adopted the “fuhrerprinzip” of the Nazi legal theorist, Carl Schmitt.
STORY NUMBER FOUR: JACQUES CHEMINADE PROVES KING-MAKER FOR SOCIALIST PARTY CANDIDATE HOLLANDE
Yes. We must ask this question WHAT FAVORS DID CHEMINADE GET FOR THROWING HIS SUPPORT TO HOLLANDE? Rallies weight to succeed Francois Hollande and these are bad moves undermine the morale of the outgoing president. Looking shameful opportunism after the debate, Jacques Cheminade – 84 969 votes in the first round, or 0.27% of the vote-just called to vote for the Socialist candidate. Nicolas Sarkozy never ceasing to repeat that the election will play out in a handkerchief, it would seem that these precious votes that will make the difference might have escaped him. The problem now is what was negotiated behind the scenes. In the right circles, we talk about thirty districts and a state secretariat to spatial planning and construction of a landing strip for alien spacecraft on the Campus Martius.
The cynicism of Francois Hollande decidedly left speechless. After yielding of the ecologists and promised the release of nuclear energy in less than six months then the Left Front in accepting the principle of collective ownership of means of production before 2014 and the opening of several gulags in Morbihan for employers CAC 40, the following become hostage to Mr. Cheminade and his guru the strange American Lyndon Larouche.
While we do not come to trial ill Nicolas Sarkozy, who would campaign under pressure from Marine Le Pen. Instead of looking at the mote in our brother’s eye, eh …
Making fun of a French car-Bike exchange?
So my little Cécile Duflot, to become minister of your desired lifestyle as you can go and get you brush your hair done by a wind turbine. This is 0.2% of Jacques Cheminade who saved the Corrézien of Rouen, and it is up to him to be blisters of the intergalactic transport minister, but not!
STORY NUMBER FIVE: POST OFFICE TOUR and media round-up
Dateline Rapid City Nestled at the bottom of this week’s Pennington County Commission agenda is an interesting item: “Request for support of congressional bills HCR107, HR1489 and the NAWAPA water project – LaRouche PAC.” [...]
The movement of perennial presidential candidate Lyndon LaRouche is largely before my time (though they had a resurgence a few years back with protests against President Barack Obama’s health care reform proposals), but I know enough that the name jumped out immediately to me. [...]
They want the commission to “urge Kristi Noem to endorse the following:” [...]
That post-it note on the front page of the top document was put there by the commission assistant; LaRouche representative Ron Wieczorek, who lost the 1998 South Dakota Democratic Congressional primary, was the one who dropped off the initial packet of information. Wieczorek considered speaking at the public comment period at the commission’s last meeting; he or Fairchild will probably present the LaRouche information at Tuesday’s meeting:
Douglas Wiken Says:
April 30th, 2012 at 7:17 pm
Restoring the Glass-Stegall act is not a bad idea even if La Roche organization is for it and all the banks to big to fail are against it.
Thad Wasson Says:
April 30th, 2012 at 8:05 pm
Someone tell these LaRoche guys that congress hasn’t declared war since Bill Welsh and the Claremont Honkers got their first six man football championship.
(Historically, Canada sort of vetoed the NAWAPA Project, deeming it a wholesale assault on their natural resources. The Larouche Movement has yet to address how they will get around the Canadian problem).
Dateline Wisconsin
“I know LaRouche,” one man shouted angrily, approaching Channon and Mathias, then walking away. “He’s a nut! He’s a nut!”
He declined to be identified, as did several young men who stopped and asked for information, either expressing support or sheer curiosity. Many others walked by indifferently or declined to be engaged in debate.
Dateline Wayland Boston
As post office customers came and went, the demonstrators called to them to come to the table and learn more about the LaRouche PAC’s efforts. A few individuals did come to the table either to chat quietly or to vehemently disagree. A couple of people declined to come closer, but replied from a distance that they found the message “offensive.”
Wayland Police Chief Bob Irving said in an email that dispatch had received a few calls about the demonstration, but the demonstrations involved “some people exercising their right to free speech on a public sidewalk.”
“Should it become a hazard for traffic or create any other impediment to public safety,” Irving continued in his email, “we will work with the protesters/organizers to insure [sic] that their, and everyone else’s, rights and public safety are protected.”
Signs of Spring:
What his minions probably don’t realize, however, is that they’re actually doing the President a big fat favor. The way I see it, if they can get one – just one - frothing-at-the-mouth teabagger to write Lyndon in on the ballot in November, then that’s, like, one Google ad that Obama doesn’t have to run. And the thing is, these people are just dying for a legitimate excuse to not vote for Obama besides, well, you know. So if Obama’s Hitler, then that just makes everything perfectly clear and happy in their minds. [...]
Carrier 8 (approaching like someone trying to act casual, points): You (inaudible) Obama/Hitler poster.
LaRouche Clone: Oh, yeah…well, I don’t know if you’re aware-
C8: Because that sure (inaudible) freaks.
LRC: What’s that?
C8: Yeah! (exeunt)
Letter to the Editor: I had the same experience in downtown Los Altos. They yelled at me after I told them that they should be ashamed of themselves and should learn about history.
Dateline Michigan. Alex Jones Interlude. Alex Jones: The Nation’s Most Influential Larouchie
A flyer recently placed on parking meters in downtown Grand Rapids pictures President Barack Obama next to a Nazi swastika, threatening that a “Holocaust is coming.”
“Obama is a puppet,” reads the handout that decries the Affordable Care and the National Defense Authorization acts. “Hitler’s Nazi Germany has been revived in the U.S. and the target is Americans.” [...]
Jones took the card off of two others, believing it was inappropriate to force an audience to see the printed rant that pairs Obama with an atrocity like the Holocaust.
“I certainly respect the right to an opinion, but this is a sick opinion,” said Jones. “People have a right to say what they want, print what they want and hand it out, but that gives me a chance to say no. It has gone too far when it’s put on public meters and to a captive audience without a choice.
“I know conservatives don’t like (Obama), but with the swastikas, it’s just too much for me.” [...]
Readers of the card are referred to a website to sign a petition that espouses tea party ideas and urges people to support Ron Paul. The views there come from a woman who claims to live in Grand Rapids, but listings for a person by the same name were disconnected or answered by people who denied knowledge of the flyer and the petition. [...]
More updates on this exciting story: Doug Koopman, a political science professor at Calvin College, also believes the impact is minimal. The distribution was apparently limited to five parking spaces, and three of the cards were grabbed by a person who took offense to the literature.
And Kurt Nimmo at Alex Jones site retorts.
This becomes more interesting still, in light of a previous article from AIM contributor Cliff Kincaid against Larouche by way of a supposed connection with Alex Jones (one which has later manifested itself as Larouche has become a frequent guest and Jones’s sights have began occasionally referencing the organization as sources):
JOHN BIRCH SOCIETY ISSUES critical attack, seeming to WARN members against associating with this cult
From The John Birch Society: Though often overlooked in the media and the world of politics, LaRouche also wields some influence, though just how much remains unclear. He controls, for instance, a vast network of entities ranging from publications and cultural initiatives to “intelligence”-gathering operations and even political parties on the other side of the Atlantic. [...]
But while LaRouche’s views on the monetary system sometimes resonate with advocates of sound money — at least initially — his statements hardly outline a plan to move toward a free market-based system. Like honest-money activists, LaRouche supports ending the privately owned Federal Reserve monopoly. He has also expressed support for a gold standard. [...]
Aside from economic and monetary matters, many of LaRouche’s supporters are initially attracted to the movement by an array of positions that match their own. LaRouche is generally anti-war, for example. His opposition to radical United Nations “solutions” to address supposed “climate change” — formerly known as “global warming” and still based on largely discredited UN theories about humanity’s role in the process — have won him some supporters, too.
Cultural elements play a big part in his recruitment efforts as well, with LaRouche supporters organizing all manner of conferences and talks supposedly related to classical music or similar fields. According to people who have attended such events, however, they tend to end up being used to push LaRouche’s views and collect more followers.
Cue British Dentist joke at Ron Paul Forums. (Note again, the youtube clip in support of Diane Sare that compares her favorably to Ron Paul as against her opponent being unfavorably Barack Obama.)
Executive Intelligence Review citation review
Canadian oligarch Maurice Strong is one of Vice President Al Gore, Jr.’s closest collaborators, one of Lyndon LaRouche, Jr.’s most long-standing oligarchical opponents, and a leading proponent of the policies of Malthusian zero growth that have propelled the AIDS pandemic forward.
US Sponsored Protest Movement in Malaysia.
Harley Schlanger on Dr. Deagle.
Douglas Degroot on Iran over Sudan.
Of course Lyndon LaRouche and his cult followers just do not seem to mind to support a fellow cult of personality which is what Omar al-Bashir has going around his government. And why are these traitors appearing on Iranian state run television without any action?
The Unflattering Conmparison Game
David Lindsay alludes to Larouche in reference to Newt Gingrich.
SHE BLINDED ME WITH SCIENCE
You might think that de Lange, Treadgold and Lyndon LaRouche make for strange bedfellows, but when you have nothing better to turn to, I suppose — as Steven Stills so memorably sang — you have to love the one you’re with. Rather a pity for all their credibility, what little might be left of it.
But he’ll have the last laugh when the LaRouchies petition to put him on the ballot after he’s dead (LaRouche lives! Like Frodo and Rabbi Schneersohn).
Making fun of Sarah Palin and the “Liberal Establishment” that did her in. With a Fletcher Hanks graphic on the sidebar.
HISTORICAL NOTES
1984 ballot access rulings Helping out Gary Johnson and the Libertarian Party.
Joel Bellman on the day Orson Welles died
The following week, as it turned out, based on some previous investigative reporting I had done, I was subpoenaed to testify as an expert witness in a civil lawsuit brought against the Lyndon LaRouche political cult. After almost two full days on the stand, getting pounded in cross-examination by the LaRouche attorney – an aggressive former prosecutor – I was exhausted and anxious to get back to my documentary.
As I was about to pull out of the parking lot, I snapped on KNX for a quick news update, only to hear: “Actor-director Orson Welles was found dead today in the Hollywood Hills home where he had recently been staying. Officials said he had suffered an apparent heart attack, and died alone. Welles, 70, was best known…”
Larouche is right 2012!
-WTF! How does a convict with a mullet hair style (business on the front, party in the back) get many more votes than Larouche in a bid for the White House? Looks like the Mullet trumps NAWAPA in West Va Lyn.
http://www.nola.com/newsflash/index....30691af8f7a28e
...Keith Judd received more than 72,400 votes against President Barack Obama, around 41 percent of the total, providing stark evidence of the incumbent Democrat's unpopularity in the state.......
Judd has run for president since at least 1996, frequently petitioning to get on the ballot in West Virginia and other states. But since 1999, he's pursued his candidacies from federal prison: he's serving a 17-year sentence for making threats, and is currently held at the Texarkana Federal Correctional Institute in Texas
Judd is not the first imprisoned felon to seek the presidency. Eugene Debbs, a socialist leader and labor activist, waged his final campaign for the White House while behind bars in 1920. More recently, fringe politician and perennial candidate Lyndon LaRouche ran for president in 1992 while serving a 15-year sentence for mail fraud and tax conspiracy. LaRouche appeared on several state primary ballots that year including West Virginia's, where he received 3,141 votes.
I have been thinking some more about Larouche declaring that Obama has been running operations against him since 1989. Could Obama have been the person who secretly ordered and ran the assassination attempt on Larouche by sending him to the Mayo clinic for a colonoscopy to remove polyps???????
http://www.subgenius.com/subg-digest/v0/0088.html
Mother of El Santo!!!!!
This assassination attempt on Larouche by removing polyps via a colonoscopy was on Sept. 16, 1989
! 1989! This means that Bush Sr was just the fall guy lackey if Larouche perished and 28 year old Barack Obama who was masquerading as a law intern in Chicago and checking out Michelle at the time for an alibi was the real London mastermind!!
Game, set and match Obama. Larouche has cracked the colonoscopy caper .
Have a great Mother's Day weekend.
xlcr4life@hotmail.com
Last edited by xlcr4life; 05-11-2012 at 05:04 PM.
Senior Member
.."Perhaps it were more appropriate to refer to them as the Fort Bend-over Democrats! "
So classy, as ever. Shameless homophobia is always funny. Good one, Kesha!!! Only a Golden Soul could be that witty.
Senior Member
The Weekly Repor'
This week I was reminded of the lines by William Carlos Williams:
The descent beckons,
as the ascent beckoned.
"The Descent"
We are promised another logorrhoeic exercise on "The Great Hypothesis" which will be "Lyn's" latest effort to prove to himself that he will not suffer eternal damnation after his soon demise. Of course Cody (or is that Creighton Cody?) was sitting next to him, so the title "The Great Pumpkin" had already been taken.
Have fun!
We got a thing ... goin' on, me and Mrs. Jones ...
Like I said: the same boring garbage over and over and over.
Senior Member
LOL does the above post count towards this? It's so boring but you keep coming back. What a loser. Is it hard having nothing better to do? I know I'd be depressed.
Senior Member
Can't Help Himself
Well, it's good to know that "friend" is following this discussion board like a hawk--sort of the still point of the turning world.
Board Adminstrator
Senior Member
That's why it's called a cult, Einshtein.
Senior Member
Out of the Blue
Completely unrelated to anything else--I was just looking at old LaRouchean pronouncements on Shakespeare, on how he had banned East Coast Shakespeare work with the Baltimore LYM in 2004 (the people working with them were Ken Kronberg, Paul Gallagher, and Mary Jane Freeman), because only he--only Lyn--knew anything about Shakespeare, blah blah blah.
It was one of his many vicious attacks on the membership for wanting to do Shakespeare--partciularly directed against Ken, who took the cancellation much, much harder than Paul or Mary Jane.
So I thought it would be interesting to post a little thing about Ken's drama career. (Lyn was always calling for "trained professionals," by which he meant Robert Beltran. Strange, since in everything else he hated experts--but maybe it was useful in raising $$ from Beltran.)
Anyhow, without further ado, Ken's drama work (as with Plato, Ken forgot more about it than Lyn ever knew):
St. John’s
Directed Noye’s Fludde
Directed Aria da Capo (Edna St. Vincent Millay)
Directed fully staged reading of Women of Trachis (Sophocles, trans. Ezra Pound)
Acted in Many Loves (William Carlos Williams)
ICLC
Shakespeare
Extra, assistant director in Hamlet (3 full-length performances two cities)
Directed Macbeth (10 full-length performances, seven cities)
Directed Love’s Labors Lost (never performed)
Directed staged reading The Tempest (never performed)
Directed scene from Twelfth Night (adults)
Directed scenes from Act II Midsummer Night’s Dream (teenagers)
Directed scenes from [b]Act V Midsummer Night’s Dream (adults)
Consulted, scenes from Act V Midsummer Night’s Dream (Adults)
Directed Acts I–III Two Gentlemen of Verona (teenagers, never performed)
Directed Act IV from Merchant of Venice(teenagers)
Act V Merchant of Venice (adults)
Directed scene from Measure for Measure (adults)
Seminar reading aloud The Taming of the Shrew (teenagers)
Directed scenes, Acts 1–IV Julius Caesar (adults; under title Vox Populi)
Led teen trips to Two Gentlemen of Verona and The Tempest
Marlowe
Acted in The Jew of Malta (two performances)
Extra in Tamburlaine (one performance)
Schiller
Directed The Parasite (three full performances, two cities, adults)
Directed scene from Mary Stuart (adults)
Directed scenes from Don Carlos (adults)
Dramatic reading prologue Maid of Orleans
Seminar reading aloud William Tell (teenagers)
Cervantes Interludes
Acted in The Divorce Court
Directed The Cave of Salamanca (adults)
Consulted on The Pageant of Marvels (two different productions, teens)
Children’s performances
Directed The Odyssey (two different productions, full performances)
Adapted and directed The Magic Flute (full performance; music director, Alan Ogden)
Adapted children’s plays on Columbus, Abe Lincoln, William Tell
Well, Lyn, as I've told you before, the self-taught man has a fool for a teacher. Or, in this case, Lyn, the self-untaught man has a fool for a teacher/student/master/slave. Whatever.
But Ken knew what he was talking about.
Was LaRouche right again?
Do you think the recent JP Morgan derivatives losses will help get Glass-Steagall passed?
Senior Member
Since LaRouche has been predicting that the economy was going to collapse (not just depression, but new dark ages wiping out of billions of people) since the 1950s, when Glass-Steagall was still in effect (cancelled when, 1999, under Pres. Clinton?), I am not sure that your G-S is the capitalist cure all you think it is.
Senior Member
I don't think they are saying Glass-Steagall is the cure all. Rather, they are saying that, unless Glass-Steagall is brought back first, then there can be no cure.
Senior Member
First Summer Vanishes, Then Sky Disappears, and Now Cody changes his name to Creighton. Weird!!
First Summer Vanishes, Then Sky Disappears, and Now Cody changes his name to Creighton. Weird!!
Having committed innumerable blunders, the Shields brothers have likely been exiled to card tables in California, probably fighting Ally Perebikosky off her turf in Sacramento.
But what's up with Cody Jones adopting the "Creighton" moniker? I know its probably his father's original work, but honestly: Why didn't he name himself Cody Hermyle Jones or Lyndon Cody LaJones when he had the chance?
https://laroucheirishbrigade.wordpre...on-cody-jones/
Senior Member
LaRouche Irish Bathingum
Ah, yessh, lads, the LaRoche Irish Brigadoon ... dedicate in the grande Lrooshian tradition of nighty giitin boiled like an owl.
Less hear it for that grrreat scholer of Nicholas of Cuz, John Barleycorn.
(No! Don put a mustache on that one, fellers. Over here, on this bottle o' Bombay Gin. har har har)
Senior Member
For a while it was Creighton "Cody" Jones or Cody Jones, interchangeably. Now Creighton seems to be what he's settled on.
Apologies for knowing that.
Senior Member
The website is hilariously Pro. Where's the sleek look of the LPAC sites?
Paid Member
First Summer Vanishes, Then Sky Disappears, and Now Cody changes his name to Creighton. Weird!!
Older members are probably having a laugh at this new development by imagining Larouche yelling at new Number One around the clock. All that is needed for final act is for Helga to leave ......................
Plenty of people have been arguing the errors of repealing Glass Steagall. Even Paul Volker has had proposals to reverse several banking practices. I generally do not wish to discuss politics here but I will say this about housing , investments and banks. The banking lobby has been spending a gazillion dollars to rewrite and screw up any legislation which they are opposed to, even if it it to keep them from blowing themselves apart. The "Volker Rule" is among selective legislation which is being fiercely opposed. There will not ever be one bill to save humanity as the cult wishes to believe but a never ending activity of rules and laws which can be changed, challenged in the courts, voted out or changed to be the complete opposite along with riders. From the moment I first came around the LC there was never any sort of work in progress with legislating bodies to add what we we perceived as beneficial as most lobbyists or orgs do, but a final , end of the world deadline where humanity's fate was dependent on the Emergency Agricultural Bill or Fusion act being passed. This was all a silly game in the cult because what Larouche has set up is something where HE is the main focus and nothing else. If HE was not the main focus, why would anyone with some skills, talent and drive be wasting time in the cult of personality? A few years ago I could see someone like Kesha being involved in some rationale work within something like the Dem Party. However, her recent wild eyed appearance after Larouche declares that Obama has been conducting operations against him since 1989 shows otherwise.
My field of employment is a pretty good field with talented people. Pre 2000 I noticed that a good chunk of people were going wacky about hi tech stocks and day trading. The euphoria seemed to take over simple questions of how unknown companies with no cash flow are worth so much. Bubbles do burst and soon hardly anyone I knew listed themselves as a day trading hobbyist. The criminal element was a big factor as we saw in Enron and other companies.
In the housing bubble today, I see weekly trials and convictions of an incredible amount of people who were involved in mortgage fraud as housing prices were being driven up and up. I have been through several such bubbles , but this one had an incredible amount of fraud which in many cases violated no laws. At work I came across a new set of people who went into two directions. One set which had solid jobs decided that they were losing out on a fortune they were heard was being made my mtg brokers. Many of them are still trying to get their jobs back. Another set of employees wanted to become real estate barons and began to flip houses and become over leveraged. Same results.
The criminal part was incredible when you see the phony appraisals, inspections and how the mtg industry was lending money. The large banks and brokerage houses were criminal in their bundling and selling of toxic securities. After the bubble burst, we found that the banks began mass foreclosures using crooked means with law firms who were doing crooked business in the legal end of things. We have had law firms with thousand of employees go belly up over the fraud. The banks also screwed entire neighborhoods and cities by neglecting the properties after eviction while then legally denying ownership when it came to taxes, HOA fees and maintenance. You can pass a 100 Glass Steagall acts and large banks would laugh at cities that wanted abandoned properties cleaned up and sold fast. It will still take years and years to fully untangle the criminality. For years and years, just like in every other decade, I would read about similar bubbles on a regional level.
For a present day LYM member who decides to leave and resume their life, I was in the same boat myself in finding employment, returning to school and starting from scratch. You can relocate and take advantage of many opportunities while young which are much harder when you are older and with a family. Today you could find a reasonable house so cheap that if you know what you are doing with a short sale, the price is very doable.
Your health and well being should be your concern instead of some joker NC who blew their life as Larouche laughed at them and kicked their fellow members to iceflows. 20 turns to 30. 30 turns to 40 and soon you blink and now you are 60 + years old and card table shrining while the joker NC yells at you for blocking the same way they yelled at you several decades earlier! My money is on Helga winning the keys to the Kingdom and everyone having that Larouche boat anchor for ever till you die. Data transfer speeds will increase and everyone who has a phone can just do a search for "Larouche" faster and keep on walking away faster.
I have found that there are plenty of ways to meet legislators and make things better. It definitely does not have the romance of saving humanity from the Larouche Trilogy of Terror
-Nuclear war
-New Dark Ages
-Economic collapse
but the real world has thousands of things happening at the same time and you pick your passions instead of getting picked at by a Larouche vulture.
You can watch simple videos about Glass Steagall like this one.
http://money.cnn.com/video/news/2010...gall.cnnmoney/
I just signed a petition from the Elizabeth Warren US Senate campaign in Mass to bring back legislation like this. In the cult, Paul Volker was a genocidalist. If you go back to the late 1980s you will do a double take when you see that you can take just about anything Larouche said at the time about "Gramm Rudman" and see that Glass Steagall fits like a glove. Back than when we were anti communist warriors calling old ladies for their life savings, Gramm Rudmann was the secret plot to stop the SDI and destroy the US military.
What every commentator who mentions Glass Steagall has in common is that they aren't trying to get you to join and work , er "volunteer" in a cult for several decades. Over all, no matter what you may support or oppose while in the cult is meaningless since the whole shebang is to support Larouche, Lyn now and Helga next. I think the money now is being wagered on Helga pulling ahead of Harley, Debbie, Jeff and Nancy. What the Heckt is going on here? Easy. Europe is being described to the cult as the place where they are not as dumb as Americans in rejecting Larouche and have the sophistication to save humanity with a Larouche behind the wheel. The endless goofing on Cheminade by the French brought some people pack to Earth, but you just play the vote fraud cheap parlor trick and move on .
Larouche is right 2012!
-Larouche and Gingrich in the same article in a major financial magazine!!!!
http://blogs.ajc.com/political-insid...cian%E2%80%99/
In politics as in life, Newt Gingrich is a man of expensive tastes and somewhat more modest resources. He limped out of the Republican primary on May 2, but his campaign remains the most indebted in the country according to Forbes research. As of March 31, 2012 (the most recent federal filing available), Gingrich’s campaign owed consultants and vendors $4.3 million—including more than $1 million for private jet service and $271,775.58 to the candidate himself for travel expenses.
Primary candidates often outspend themselves in pursuit of their party’s nomination, hoping that they’ll be able to raise enough money to cover bills once they’ve united the party’s donors. Even so, Gingrich’s campaign debt is unusually large: Rick Santorum, who lasted nearly as long as Gingrich in the Republican nominating contest and won twice as many delegates, has less than half as much campaign debt as of March 31.
The second-largest campaign debt belongs to conspiracy theorist and perennial candidate Lyndon LaRouche, whose five political action committees have amassed debts of more than $3.2 million, including nearly 5,000 loans from individual donors to his 1984 campaign totaling over $1.7 million. Those loans are remnants of a practice for which LaRouche was convicted of fraud in 1988 when a jury found he had no intention of repaying them....
2. Lyndon LaRouche (Labor/D): $3,231,440
The eight-time presidential candidate took in loans worth $1,765,289.50 from individual supporters for his 1984 run. Federal prosecutors argued he had no intention of repaying those loans, and that he was using them to skirt contribution limits. LaRouche was convicted in 1988 on counts related to mail fraud and tax evasion and served five years in a federal prison hospital.
This is an amazing event here. Gerald Pechenuk has been in the LC since the mid 1970s. He comes in to this Forbes article giving us a very keen insight into how long term members think. Instead of the accolades expected for Larouche, the readers goof on Larouche and demonstrate the real role Larouche has . For this you wish to give up your life and freedom for?
Gerald Pechenuk
May 15th, 2012
5:20 pm
To the Political Insider, Jim Galloway,
A couple of slight corrections are in order. First, you should report which political leader
in the US are “MOST INDEBTED TO,” NOT THE MOST IN DEBT.
The Hands Down Winner is who you list as number 2, Lyndon LaRouche.
He is the only political leader who warned people, starting in the late 1960’s , of the impending global financial collapse, which you all have to admit, despite your fancy sophistical tricks, has struck with a vengence.
So, ALL OF US ARE MOST IN DEBT TO Lyndon LaRouche for telling the truth which others refuse to face. to this very day!
honested
May 15th, 2012
5:24 pm
Gerald P..
As for larouche, the parable of the blind hog and the acorn comes to mind.
Aaron Burr V Mexico
May 15th, 2012
5:24 pm
Right so if you’d like to learn more about the man that some people think we’re so indebted to, read for yourselves.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lyndon_LaRouche
Note that giggling is probably considered a personal attack.
Look before I leap...
May 15th, 2012
5:35 pm
Warning about financial collapse since the 60’s is kind of like predicting a major earthquake in California every year.
Most years you look like an idiot and no one cares.
Then the big one DOES come and you look like a genius.
Lyndon LaRouche is the moonbat of all moonbats.
Centrist
May 15th, 2012
5:42 pm
Look posted “Lyndon LaRouche is the moonbat of all moonbats.”
Wow, that’s saying a lot. There have been a LOT of moonbats, and as already noted – some still walk amongst us.
pb
May 15th, 2012
5:55 pm
Larouche is still alive by the way. 80 something years old. Among other things, he believe so the queen of england is responsible for international drug trade. Look him up on Wikipedia. An interesting nut case of a long standing.
-Since we all agree that Larouche must be seen and heard as far and wide as possible, it is indeed a joyful occasion that his LPAC announcement that Obama has been running an operation against him since 1989 is viewable.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IVlaK...feature=relmfu
The Larouche webcast that declares that Obama has built gas chambers in the USA is also available to spread Larouche.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CyEN6...1&feature=plcp
-This is too funny because it shows that some of the Russians are as easilly taken in by Larouche and the cult as the Alex Jones goofballs in the US are.
https://laroucheirishbrigade.wordpre...es-in-the-u-s/
Russian Historian Speaks About the U.S. and Lyndon LaRouche
Posted on May 10, 2012 by LaRouche Irish Brigade
In the interview published as part of the Terra America series on Lyndon LaRouche, prominent Russian historian Andrei Fursov took on the likes of fascist Obama aide Cass Sunstein for their use of “conspiracy theory” against Lyndon LaRouche. The section of the Fursov interview dealing with this question (the full interview has now been reprinted in Zavtra) is worth noting.
Asked by interviewer Benediktov about why no U.S. intellectuals would be interviewed on LaRouche, Fursov gave several reasons. First, he characterized the “intellectual community” in the USA as a “tightly controlled” community, worse than the Soviet era. Second, he said that LaRouche raises “very acute and timely issues” which “contradict modern Western theories of history and political science” and the “generally accepted ideology and agenda.” Third, he noted that LaRouche has developed a system, with a “solid factual basis for his ideas,” which makes it difficult to challenge.
Fursov notes that he himself considers “the large part” of LaRouche’s conclusions to be true. To be specific:
“What does LaRouche tell us? Simple things: that the real power is secret power, and that many secrets of our time go back to the turn of the 15th-16th centuries; that there are certain supranational organizations, which guide the historical process or, at minimum direct it. LaRouche absolutely correctly identifies the role of Venice and the East India Company in the development of the modern world and its ruling groups.”
Read the full article here
So, ALL OF US ARE MOST IN DEBT TO Lyndon LaRouche..
Thanks GP. This stuff does write itself.
xlcr4life@hotmail.com
There are currently 6 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 6 guests)
Posting Permissions
