Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Fox News

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Potticawl Farms, LA
    Posts
    1,293

    Default Fox News

    I have posted two articles on school news with more to follow. The articles were taken verbatim from ABC News. I knew the leftwing would justify itself by lamenting Fox News. I love watching them waffle and wallow.
    "Socialism, in general, has a record of failure that's so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Dr. Thomas Sowell

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Here, now.
    Posts
    3,493

    Default

    Well then, Cowshut, what you need to do is post links to the stories you bring here. Your comment about the “leftwing waffling and wallowing” doesn’t really mean anything, and is only part of your toxic right-wing propaganda rhetoric.

  3. #3
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Posts
    3,172

    Default

    "I love watching them waffle"

    Dodge,

    Put a little more of that Maine syrup on them and enjoy!
    *
    Trust in the LORD with all your heart and lean not unto your own understanding. In all your ways acknowledge Him, and He will direct your path.

  4. #4
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Here, now.
    Posts
    3,493

    Default Waffling

    I got your waffle right here, Easeltine. Take a great big bite.

  5. #5
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    New Jack City
    Posts
    237

    Default

    Is "got your waffle right here" a metaphor for "pig in a blanket"?

    I sensed a tone of homoeroticism, which made me vaguely uncomfortable but only in the sense of the uncalled for sensualization of common, frozen breakfast items...
    "Man is kind enough when he is not excited by religion".
    Mark Twain

  6. #6
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Potticawl Farms, LA
    Posts
    1,293

    Default

    Actually, one has no reason to post a source for news. That is the nature of news. Reporters, news agencies, report fact. Manipulated media, on the other hand, reports opinions. That is why I do not listen to manipulated . . . lamestream media.
    "Socialism, in general, has a record of failure that's so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Dr. Thomas Sowell

  7. #7
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Here, now.
    Posts
    3,493

    Default

    Cowshut -- Citing reliable sources is an important part in any sharing of information, in order to verify the material. Without linking to where you got your information anything you say is nothing but politically-motivated propaganda.

    It doesn’t surprise me that you, as a right-wing propagandist, used the term “lamestream media,” something Sarah Palin adopted to describe any news source other than Fox.

    As Arden Jensen, a Ph.D. professor of English at Lee University said, “The more she complains about the ‘lamestream media’ the more it covers her and increases her earnings potential.” This is how she talked her way into celebrity and wealth.

    http://webpages.leeu.edu/ajensen/cou...or-analysis-2/

    “After the Republicans’ defeat in 2008, she quit her job as governor of Alaska and re-introduced herself to the public through Facebook, Twitter, a memior, a new gig as a commentator on Fox television and a reality TV show about Alaska, without the interference of what she called the ‘lamestream media.” (Alexis Gelber, Shorenstein Center Goldsmith Fellow)

    http://www.hks.harvard.edu/presspol/...d63_gelber.pdf

    Using the term “lamestream media” reveals your association with the far right, and your posting here at FACTnet as a vehicle for right wing propaganda.

  8. #8
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    Potticawl Farms, LA
    Posts
    1,293

    Default

    Actually, 80% of the people in the U.S. use the term "lame-stream media."

    As for Palin's "Alaska," she mantained a viewing audience of three-million-per-episode for all thirteen programs. That is a feat no leftwing radical can come close to. MSNBC, CNN, etc. do good to atract an audience of less than one-million-viewers-per-episode. So, yes, it is lame-stream media based on viewer numbers alone, not to mention its opinionated reporting bias. Even you have acknowledged lamestream media's reporting bias on this thread.
    "Socialism, in general, has a record of failure that's so blatant that only an intellectual could ignore or evade it." Dr. Thomas Sowell

  9. #9
    Join Date
    Jan 1970
    Location
    Here, now.
    Posts
    3,493

    Default

    What nether region did you pull that statistic from, “80% of people in the U.S. use the term lame-stream media?” Most likely from that place where the sun doesn’t shine and where your keep your head buried, the right-wing bubble of disinformation.

    The same goes for your claims about Sarah Palin’s Alaska series ratings. You said that “she maintained a viewing audience of three-million-per-episode for all thirteen programs.” You seem to have forgotten that the Alaska series was on TLC, which is not a cable news channel; so comparing that to MSNBC or CNN doesn’t work in terms of ratings. AMC’s Walking Dead had almost seven million viewer last week, and The History Channel’s Pawn Stars and MTV’s Jersey Shore got more than five million viewers.

    http://tvbythenumbers.zap2it.com/201...9-2012/121143/

    What does that tell you? As you said, “based on viewer numbers alone,” more people are interested in watching a group of survivors battle zombies and a reality series showing the daily activities of a pawn shop in Los Vegas then were interested in watching Sarah Palin live her life in Alaska.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •